Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.
Poor countries are frequently given financial support from wealthy countries, but it does not solve poverty. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that developed countries should provide aid in other ways rather than money.
Firstly, I believe that money cannot resolve any problem. Although it seems very generous to give financial help to poorer countries, it is not. Actually, this money should be given back until a certain period. All of this makes the progress harder and slower. For example, many poor countries owe developed countries a large amount of money, which affects the economy and production because of the economic sanctions from those countries.
Secondly, instead of money, rich countries should give their knowledge about development technology or logistic industry to poorer countries. With this knowledge, undeveloped countries can improve their industries. For instance, they can transform their manual industries into automated production. As a result, the product quantity increases significantly, as well as the quality. Besides, the export value of products increases and the economy of countries may improve steadily.
Thirdly, the employees of undeveloped countries are mostly low-skilled. Wealthy countries should train these employees. This can apply to scientific and technical advances in production. Additionally, the unemployed have more potential opportunities to get a job.
In conclusion, developed countries should give other types of help like sharing knowledge or training qualified employees, rather than financial aid to poorer countries. Because the target is to help them, not to give them more and more loans which they have to pay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64566929134 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8782301104 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594488188976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9128101823 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6666666667 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1111111111 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61111111111 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501073888304 0.244688304435 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137135667937 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130508995865 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283662193455 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908343313236 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.