Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
Independence and sovereignty of the homeland has always been in lime light. According to a group of people, developed countries and super powers, must lend financial help to developing countries. On the other hand, people avow that provision of help by non-financial means, plays a better role. This essay strongly agrees with the later, i.e. provision of facilities and opportunities is a better help, to the developing countries.
At first looking at the history of China- the rapidly developing super power, hard work and quality education can be declared as the pivotal elements for financial stability of any country. The set up of small and large industries in China, has turned it into the biggest manufacturer worldwide. The developing and poorer countries, spend great fortunes on provision of basic facilities rather than, expenditure on creating job opportunities, by investing on industries. The first world countries can invest in these struggling countries, providing employments, resulting in the prosperity of the citizens.
On the other hand, when super powers lend financial aid to the poorer countries, it helps them temporarily. But, in return the smaller countries, end up lying in deeper debts. The sovereignty of a country comes with its own financial stability, which is ad ream without qualified personnel. Money, does not guarantee the progress, but prosperous people do. Considering the example of Pakistan, which is an atomic power, but is in high debts due to multiple loans and financial aids from the stronger bodies worldwide.
Thus, in a nutshell, helping the people- by the provision of basic health facilities, better jobs, installation of industries, quality education and security from foreign invasion is actual help. Rather, than pushing the poverty- struck countries into the deep wells of debts and financial instability.
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- in countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'into the biggest'.
Suggestion: into the biggest
...arge industries in China, has turned it into biggest manufacturer worldwide. The developing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...oreign invasion is actual help. Rather, than pushing the poverty- struck countries i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, thus, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92379782988 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4778550746 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.176470588 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272930221057 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859380051887 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709534863015 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168250680336 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230337298127 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.