Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a considerable amount of well-educated workers lived around the world, but unfortunately, some of them come from poor countries and they do not have chance to perform their experience. Therefore, it is suggested that rich countries should welcome skilled employees from poor countries to work in the developed environment. In my opinion, I agree with this suggestion due to the benefits brought to both employees in poor countries and the government in developed nations.
Allowing skillful employees from developing countries brings numerous advantages to workers. these people will have better occasion to change another companies, which has more professional work environment. Not only the opportunities of enjoying a wide range of professional environment for career progression but also the level of salary from managers will be more than expected. As a result, skilled staff is able to improve their living conditions thanks to the high income. Furthermore, international knowledgeable people have ability to migrate permanently. that’s the reason why these days more and more students decide to study abroad in developed countries.
Besides, those developed countries also gain gigantic profits from accepting poor labors. As I have said before, knowledgeable people will have more opportunities to immigrate to those rich countries when they are permitted. so, the more staffers make a decision of living and working in developed countries, the more progressive these countries become. For instance, USA, Canada or European Union, because they are cheerful to international well-educated staff, these countries are recognized as wealthy nations.
In conclusion, it is the fact that opening boundary for immigration is a good way to improve the living condition of poor residents and so does the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-04 | quytnee | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | Sayansh Garg | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Mohsensnake | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Mohsensnake | 56 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 67
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... brings numerous advantages to workers. these people will have better occasion to cha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...le have ability to migrate permanently. that’s the reason why these days more and mo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...rich countries when they are permitted. so, the more staffers make a decision of l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61371841155 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12430628044 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8155015634 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322999868017 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116774226233 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109227247026 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189630891912 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111250137544 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.