School children are at the impressionable age and the two most influences are their teachers and parents. While it is true that the former are ones who impart their knowledge to their students, I also agree that children’ social behaviors are significantly influenced by their fathers and mothers.
In terms of intellectual development, school teachers play a primary part in its progress. Dedicated teachers exert a greater influence on their students on their subject areas. School children are far more enthusiastic in studying if their teachers have a great teaching method and knowledge resources. In fact, some people owe their lifelong love of a subject to passionate teachers who taught them in secondary school. Besides, parents can reinforce their children passion for studying by assisting them in doing homework or buying reference books.
From the social growth perspective, parental influence is undoubtedly stronger. Firstly, they are ones who their children spend most of the time with; therefore, they have more opportunities to teach and train their children behavior and social etiquette. Only by spending time playing, talking and observing their children can parents understand them and guide them in the right way to become good citizens. Secondly, school children usually see their parents as role models and imitate almost every action and ways of talking as well. For example, parents’ attitude towards the elderly, eating etiquette in restaurants and social communication are monitored and copied by their children.
From all the above-mentioned, although teachers have the greatest impact on stimulating their students' studying progress, parental influence on the development of children is stronger in social situations. Both teachers and parents have to behave morally in order to educate the next generation to become good citizens for the future world.
- The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK, 1999 -2008 61
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 85
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 84
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59169550173 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92685297092 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56401384083 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7670761486 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497154947777 0.244688304435 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190406140078 0.084324248473 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894118865523 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329753705978 0.151304729494 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716001234813 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.