schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people say that they should concentrate on learning academics, whereas others believe that soft skills are necessary for a future job. I believe that both factors are crucial in life and I will explain them in this essay.
On the one hand, the student's academic performance should achieve with flying colors in order to enhance an opportunity for their job. Take it as an example, students want to be a doctor, lawyer, or policeman. All subjects require graduates to obtain a higher certificate as well as specialising in the field of study. For example, if they do not study academic theories well, they will commit serious mistakes. That is the reason why they prefer to absorb knowledge in the work field and discover a suitable career rather than knowing how to be successful.
On the other hand, through advancing academically, students would improve soft skills such as communication, teamwork, self-study skills that are vital for daily situations in future life. It is obvious that if we want to be an actor or footballer, we pay attention to practice more than studying theory. It is better than for students who should take part in extra-curricular activities, which make them show their talents in other fields.
In conclusion, students should be proficient in academics and not neglect practical skills. It depends on the type of jobs which we prefer to become.
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0347826087 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8175925854 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604347826087 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8624280406 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114699225537 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412171567996 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356440482329 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671766266483 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349302446151 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0347826087 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8175925854 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604347826087 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8624280406 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114699225537 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412171567996 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356440482329 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671766266483 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349302446151 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.