In this modern epoch, high-technology-based devices have permeated in all facets of human-beings’ life, including communication and education. In this respect, there is an unprecedented controversial issue debating among educationalists due to ever-lasting, traditionalism-versus-modernism confrontation regarding education. Personally, I concur with the surmise that the obsolete teaching paradigm should be supersede by the multimedia-oriented approach. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall vividly highlight my endorsing reasons before a conclusion is reached.
To commence with, students could reap more benefits through multimedia classes. In accordance with an advanced survey, students participating in classes equipped with multimedia devices have a substantial increase in grasping thorny concepts. In fact, brain’s ability to make connections between verbal and visual representations, in multimedia-learning paradigm, would certainly lead to deeper comprehending and high-level critical thinking. Furthermore, since younger generations enthusiastically tend to exploit technological apparatus, applying videos, television programs and computer in classes could promote significantly their problem-solving skill compare to simply using textbooks.
Besides the aforementioned reasons, multimedia classes provide students with vast variety of practical information. In fact, classes equipped with technological devices provide untapped opportunities for teachers to illustrate less explicit concepts via infographics and videos in order to make the problems more comprehensible. Moreover, prevailing method of teaching, using textbooks, begets, alas, vast deforestation in order to supply demanded wood for paper industry. Thus, it might be plausible to perceive that the old-fashioned style of teaching should be superseded soon or late by new ones for the sake of students and the environment.
After the scrutinization of a whole matter, although it might considered as a reiteration, I fully endorse with the idea that soon or late using books for teaching must be stopped and multimedia learning should be substituted.
- At present the mass media is very influential and the lives of many people are affected by the news Why do you think this is happening Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 87
- Schools should stop using books for teaching and instead use films TV and computers Do you agree or disagree with this statement 93
- In the past knowledge was contained in books Nowadays knowledge is uploaded to the internet Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 95
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'superseded'?
Suggestion: superseded
...he obsolete teaching paradigm should be supersede by the multimedia-oriented approach. In...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.44097222222 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.03277796672 2.80592935109 144% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659722222222 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6931761708 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.692307692 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183202082707 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587855687361 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514562159237 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118380618708 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528384185538 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 50.2224549098 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.07 12.4159519038 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.58 8.58950901804 135% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'superseded'?
Suggestion: superseded
...he obsolete teaching paradigm should be supersede by the multimedia-oriented approach. In...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.44097222222 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.03277796672 2.80592935109 144% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659722222222 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6931761708 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.692307692 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183202082707 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587855687361 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514562159237 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118380618708 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528384185538 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 50.2224549098 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.07 12.4159519038 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.58 8.58950901804 135% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.