Some people think that newspaper are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that newspaper are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, no one could underestimate indispensable effects of technology-based communication tools on the press which have brought about revolution in media industry. While all these technology-driven changes to the old-fashioned media have alienated some traditional readers and prompt them to follow news through electronic and digital media, others still believe that paper-based newspaper are the convenient approach to stiff through current events. This essay will explore both aspects of this argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
On the one hand, it is contended among some circles that newspaper are irrefutable due to their trustworthy and thorough-content-providing nature. In a sense, many individuals still do not trust news that come from the internet. The relative newness of technology-related media, the lack of patently established genre, and the scarcity of the explicit editorial policies for most Web sites suggest that information via new media might be deceitful or difficult to scrutinize. Moreover when something undeniable happened in the world, the public could generally knows very quickly through internet-based news, so newspaper could not simply disseminate an event. They ought to expand the story in order to make the situation vivid enough for their readers.
On the other hand, many proponents contest the above and argue that technology-depended media are the best way of learning current events. In the era of blogs, social media and instant communication, elites and media baron no longer hold a monopoly on mass dissemination of information. This elimination of gatekeepers-to ensure the quality and authenticity of data- has allowed individuals to become news consumers. Moreover, print-based media, e.g. newspaper, brings about irretrievable ramifications on environment. In other words, since time immemorial, excessive deforestation have occurred all around the world to surmount the accumulative old-fashioned media industry’s demand for preparing required sheets. The transparency of this issue makes it understandable why may some people prefer to learn news through other media.
After analyzing all sides of the above debate, I concur equally with sides of debates, and thus to declare one better than other is simply impossible.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-21 thaokim2003 89 view
2024-05-21 thaokim2003 78 view
2021-11-29 ashkan zaheri 95 view
2021-11-10 eyraen 73 view
2021-10-27 CDTSON 67 view
Essays by user ashkan zaheri :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e deceitful or difficult to scrutinize. Moreover when something undeniable happened in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 561, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'know'
Suggestion: know
...n the world, the public could generally knows very quickly through internet-based new...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hrough internet-based news, so newspaper could not simply disseminate an event. T...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., if, may, moreover, so, still, then, thus, while, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76991150442 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48286276092 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648967551622 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9212144201 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285467251391 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830326345172 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779797910059 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14833701568 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759620397103 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.