Nowadays rapid global population growth has brought about serious predicaments such as dramatic global city-dweller increase and scarcity of food. What factors lead to the worldwide food demand and the steps that the all-over-world governments could take to tackle them, would be discussed further in this essay.
There are several reasons why food requirement surge internationally. As a global concern, individuals’ tendency to leave rural areas in order to live in cities and towns considerably increases, which precipitates serious scarce of agricultural productions. For instance, rapid slum-dwelling increase could be caused by rural people whom ought to leave their lands because of impoverishment due to inevitable problems such as famine, governments’ wrong policies that providing farmers’ needed facilities vividly appear not to be their precedence. As result, worldwide food shortage seems emanated from rural people’s tendency to live in urban areas.
There are many reasons result in the growth of food’s demand all over the world, and International authorities could play significant role in alleviating the issue. The most important measure is that governments should provide more facilities in order to develop the agriculture and cultivation in rural areas to dissuade individuals from leaving their lands. For instance, communities could guarantee a minimum prizes for agricultural products or reduce the production and cultivation costs and increasing the productivity by offering equipment leasing services. Additionally, governments must allocate further funds for bolstering transport, power supplies, etc. infrastructure. To illustrate this, local communities could offer financial support and loans to rural people in order to transform their extensive farming, traditional cultivation methods, to technology-based intensive farming methods. Therefore, governments could solve the problem by investing in farming industry.
In conclusion, though population explosion has fuelled demand for food, this issue might be met by right decision that policy-makers could make.
- There are more and more effective security measures in large cities to reduce the crime Does this endeavour bring more benefits than problems 84
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK 93
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 87
- The chart below gives some information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 984, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblem by investing in farming industry. In conclusion, though population explosi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07718120805 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25650869501 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9968440985 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.307692308 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238572191364 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783445166968 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638107222834 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153525391009 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488987361855 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.28 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.