Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether governments or private organizations should assume responsibility of scientific research. I am of opinion that this areas should be carried out and managed by the combined efforts from both sides.
The first point to support private companies’ joining is that their competition could help reduce the imbalance in the job market, as they attract more workers to scientific area which has always been attached little attention from job hunters. In fact, given the profit-oriented aiming, private organizations tend to offer high salaries and appealing employee incentives, hoping to seek out talented scientists who can make phenomenal inventions. Similarly beneficial is that private organizations' intervention would tremendously reduce the pressure that government have to shoulder. To explain, scientific research requires a huge budget since it involves invention of sophisticated equipment such as rockets, space shuttle and staff salaries. If being taken and controlled by government only, chances are that there is not enough budget for other more urgent areas like medical, education, environment.
Despite the benefits of private companies’ involvement, it is not to say that government should divert all their responsibilities. Without the management and controlment of authorities, private organizations might make constant inventions regardless of its safe and usability, as they just pay attention the seemingly appealing features to boost sales. For instance, a profit-making organization could introduce a new types of vehicles with faster speed but more pollution released, aiming at those who are not environmentally-friendly users.
To recap, owing to these reasons, it seems to me that both private companies and governments should be jointly responsible for scientist research to guarantee its development as well as the safe of the products invented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | trongduong96 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | khietquynh2402 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Yui | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Habui | 61 | view |
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development? 84
- process 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobiles phones in communication has negative effects on young people’s reading and writing skills. Agree or disagree 84
- a table shows monthly expenditure of an Australian family in 1991 and in 2001 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether governments or private organizations sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ientific research. I am of opinion that this areas should be carried out and managed...
^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...sts who can make phenomenal inventions. Similarly beneficial is that private organization...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...s. Similarly beneficial is that private organizations intervention would tremendously reduce ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 424, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'type'?
Suggestion: type
...king organization could introduce a new types of vehicles with faster speed but more ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, well, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88888888889 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45286138871 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648745519713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3648205347 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.363636364 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244901061035 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977024268876 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653240741402 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168167962915 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744880293907 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.