Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
Scientific research plays an important role in our modern era. At present, it is argued that whether should governments or private corporations conduct and control the research. In my opinion, I strongly believe that it should be carried out and supervised by the former.
The private sector claims that it is willing to undertake scientific research, but there are two significant dangers in it. From the quality aspect, research conducted by companies might have flawed results due to the fact that they minimize the funding while maximizing its profit. As a result, the outcome is not really reliable and it also leads to adverse consequences. For example, a German company which produced thalidomide caused thousands of births of malformed children many decades ago. Moreover, in terms of ethical perspective, letting private organizations do research into areas like genetic engineering may cause many social effects like environmental pollution. In fact, Genetically – modified crops (GM crops), with unproven effects, may destroy our ecosystems as a result of meddling with nature.
Although governments have to allocate numerous resources to other sets of public spending, scientific research is still extremely important that they are responsible for. Firstly, research can be carried out by university professors or students who have a high standard of professional knowledge. Consequently, the outcome both meets the quality and moral perspective’s expectation. Secondly, funding provided by authorities will be as much as the needs of the expensive genetic science to carry out the research smoothly with various adequate trials. One example is the development of renewable energy to meet highly growing demands.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that governments should take care of scientific research solely. Universities should invest more in their people to offer large numbers of well – qualified scientists in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | trongduong96 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | khietquynh2402 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Yui | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Habui | 61 | view |
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 89
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 84
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61486486486 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05282802466 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662162162162 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6303434416 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302091454176 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892426346507 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833287403901 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190357494624 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822589998146 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.