Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than companies. do you agree or disagree?
The question who should be in charge of conducting scientific research is open to debate. Some people think that the government should play the main role in executing and ruling scientific developments while others argue that advances in science should be fulfilled and managed by the private sector. In my opinion, people will benefit substantially more from research if it is implemented and strictly governed by the state instead of private enterprises because of the 2 main reasons.
The first reason is that the state can protect citizens from bad intention of some private companies by conducting and controlling scientific research on its own. The rationale for some private companies conducting scientific research might be that they solely want that economic benefits flowing from research accrue to themself. As a result, they could manipulate target customers by their research. For example, the company which launches a new drug publishes their research result that their own revolutionary goods can cure lung cancer, which would urge quite a few citizens to purchase their products in that people have more faith in medical research rather than what normal advertisements say. Nonetheless, no one knows if that research is conducted in a right way or the company intentionally misleads consumers so that they can increase their revenue.
Moreover, scientific developments conducted by the government allow more people to get access to so that the new research could be disseminated and replicated without limitations. Whereas, if the research implemented by the private companies, it would inhibits further research because of intellectual property regime. For example, when a multinational corporation discovers a technological advance, the government authority will grant it claims to economic benefits from its new scientific invention. This makes the price of products using that technological development higher, which is a drawback for consumers. Furthermore, if a medical company has intellectual property rights and skyrocket the price of its drug, people in poverty with health problems couldn’t buy it.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the state should carry out and govern the scientific research rather than private sector because it brings people more benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-31 | Nguyễn Thị Bích | 73 | view |
- FOR SCHOOL CHILDREN THEIR TEACHERS HAVE MORE INFLUENCE ON THEIR INTELLIGENCE AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAN THEIR PARENTS TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 56
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 56
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 48
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 61
- Some people believe that Employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress but the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree to this belief 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...one knows if that research is conducted in a right way or the company intentionally misleads c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'inhibit'
Suggestion: inhibit
...nted by the private companies, it would inhibits further research because of intellectua...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5641025641 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00394083201 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527065527066 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9215823417 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297344266785 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110618026333 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781530737849 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208095054308 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677951018658 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.