Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
Nobody can deny that science plays an important role of our lives. Some people believe that scientific studies should be conducted by governments instead of companies. I partly agree with this statement.
In my opinion, the authorities should take care of the sciences because of several reasons. Firstly, scientific research is the key to finding solutions of society. Though medical research, for example, needs to be conducted by governments to develop vaccines against potential epidemics. Research into renewable energies is also crucial to try to deal with global warming. By contrast, many companies take part in the scientific research to have the opportunities to maximize profit rather than have the responsibilities to communications, such as they invest more and more money as well as human in nuclear weapons or unethical human experimentations, whereas the authority is interested in the process of nation such as health-problem or education to enhance standard of human lives. Secondly, many people do not trust scientific research when private sources are involved. The scope of science is diverse and wide, the governments can co-operate researchers in many countries through the world whereas private companies could not do this.
On the other hand, I think private zone should also give a hand to do scientific research. Studying research, especially in high-tech science like exploring spaces or taking people out into spaces, needs a huge of money. This puts pressure on national budge. Besides, it is important for the government to manage their activities in order to provide high-quality and reliable results.
In conclusion, I think both the governments and private zones have the responsibility for controlling the researches of the science.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | trongduong96 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | khietquynh2402 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Yui | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Habui | 61 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46350364964 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10260409427 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602189781022 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.067157241 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324110527055 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971870391209 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711111605903 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184769718229 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252795763407 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.