scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree ?
It is true that scientific researchers are seemed to be more respected than music artists and other art followers in this modern period. I largely agree with tje said notion due to high wages appeal and contribution towards the country.
To commence with, in this globalised world there is the rule of artist on social media and on television. All the the artist are famous yet they had minimum salary. Despite, of a new artist they enjoy their success for a short period art is like as activities to prevent oneself to be get bored. The schools or institutions had 2 hours class for art but it is just only for entertainment purpose. Whether, the artists are valued by only younger generation or more liked the by teenagers because of their popularity.
On the contrary, scientific researches are now more respected by people as compared to artists and musicians because that of a high income appealing. It is irrefutably has a career choice for young ones. To elaborate it, in this 21st Era the high salary is much more famous among people for their luxurious lifestyle. To explicate it, the scientific researchers had salary of worth crores yet artists and musicians had not like them. Thus the people prefer scientist in spite of artists and musicians.
Another reason for this notion is due to the contribution towards the country. To explicate it, nowadays people follow the high praises from the world. If they choose a scientific career they will be appreciated by the country for their achievements. For instance, Albert Einstein was awarded by Nobel prize for his great achievement in the field of science. He is known as a "Father of Physics" now. Therefore, people appreciate the scientists and technology more rather than musicians and artists.
In conclusion, it is manifested that scientific researchers and modern technology are more respected by contemporary world, because of more wages and popularity in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od. I largely agree with tje said notion due to high wages appeal and contributio...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... on social media and on television. All the the artist are famous yet they had minimum ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... on social media and on television. All the the artist are famous yet they had minimum ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rtists and musicians had not like them. Thus the people prefer scientist in spite of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nowadays people follow the high praises from the world. If they choose a scienti...
^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...in the field of science. He is known as a 'Father of Physics' now. Ther...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06832298137 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87843135699 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8167363056 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8947368421 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208477405878 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656859492595 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716627662269 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1279063415 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348916613776 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.