English is fast becoming a global language. As a result, it is predicted by some language experts that the entire human population will speak one common language in the years to come. I believe that this is going to be a positive development. By providing more business opportunities to people across the globe, and bringing advancements in science and technology, it will serve as a tool for future human progress.
Firstly, having a common medium of interaction will boost business all over the world as it will obviate the language barrier. This universal language will facilitate businessmen in far away countries to explore hidden markets that were not accessible before, thereby allowing Asian traders, for instance, to sell their products in distant markets such as Africa with the help of a common language. An illustration of this can be seen in Europe where governments have introduced English as a common language for all the residents. Consequently, gross domestic product of these countries have observed an exponential growth. So, if the countries need to progress economically in the future, they will adopt a common medium of communication.
To add further credence to my assertion, the globalization of a single language will bring fruitful results in science and technology as scientists of different continents will be able to interact with each other, allowing them to share their ideas and experiences, and paving the pathway for future innovations. Furthermore, by storing scientific knowledge in a common language, it will help scientists to have unlimited access to the scientific data, which was not accessible before due to language hurdles, ultimately leading to more inventions. Hence, alleviating the language hurdles for the science community can lead to unprecedented scientific progress.
In conclusion, by allowing corporations to communicate and trade globally, and providing smooth and easy access of scientific data to the experts, a single medium of language will ensure continuous human progress in the future.
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think technology makes life complex so we should make life simpler without using technology Do you agree or disagree 78
- Scientist predict that all people will chose to talk the same global language in the future Do you think positive or negative development 56
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (asa) must be used with a third-person verb: 'tools'.
Suggestion: tools
...cience and technology it will serve asa tool for future human progress Firstly ha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34169278997 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98034559766 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520376175549 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 319.0 20.2975951904 1572% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1704.0 106.682146367 1597% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 319.0 20.7667163134 1536% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 107.0 7.06120827912 1515% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237592698197 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237592698197 0.084324248473 282% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155588556649 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438675800375 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 163.2 13.0946893788 1246% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -260.77 50.2224549098 -519% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.9 11.3001002004 1141% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.17 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.62 8.58950901804 275% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 129.6 10.1190380762 1281% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 60.0 10.7795591182 557% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.