Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is true that driverless vehicles are likely to be produced in the later stage of life, which changes the traditional driving method. From my perspective, demerits of this revoluntionary development tend to outweigh its merits.
On the on hand, vehicles driven by computers are said to contribute to alleviating the substantial number of accidents. Plenty of road accidents have been caused due to behaviors of the human. A typical example of this is that a drunken driver, who is barely able to control awareness, usually runs a red light, and therefore injuring himself and putting others’s lives at risk. With driverless vehicles being produced later in life, advanced technology will detect the surrounding environment, and it can avoid collisions with other transports without being affected by alcoho, reducing the annual number of accidents.
On the other hand, such a novel development would pose a detrimental threat to the environment. Computer-based vehicles made with high-quality technology will attract millions of consumers, especially technology addicts, and this trend could increase the production of innovative cars drastically. Thus, numerous personal vehicles will travel on roads and they tend to be the main means of daily commute in cosmopolitan metropolis. If there is such a considerable number of cars in big cities, the carbon footprint discharged from these high-tech transports will increase global warming, driving natural species including human beings to the brink of extintion. The disadvantage of this progression, from an environmental perspective, prevails over its benefit.
In conclusion, although driverless vehicles reduce the number of accidents, natural habitats and all species living on Earth would deal with the threat of environment destruction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-06 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | yaldaasgari | 61 | view |
- Some people think that governments should give financial support tocreative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artistsshould be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your ownopinion. 78
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea.What are the reasons and solutions? 78
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the bestroute to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a jobstraight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67527675277 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16758235476 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608856088561 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.618563694 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102359079439 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360571012639 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287655241153 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549961644171 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037770729376 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.