Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
In the modern day, there is a suggestion that all nations around the world should abolish their mother tongue in order to have the same language in the future. Although in terms of speaking the same language may bring several merits, from my point of view, i totally argue that it would do more harm than good.
On the other hand, An analogous of global language can have a whole host of advantages. First, by removing language barriers, it may act as golden opportunities to facilitate international activities ranging from tourism to trading in one nation. As a result, not only thousands of job vacancies would be created but also gross domestic product may be increased significantly, which takes a step into the improvement in human life quality. Second, since having the same language, either students or professionals would be able to corporate with their counterparts in numerous kinds of continents. This may lead to numerous developments in such various aspects as technology, medical, and science, which help to benefit human civilization.
On the other hand, the appearance of a universal language can have many downsides. First, it is undeniable that language presents as a part of tangible cultural heritage in one country. As a consequence, due to replacing native languages by international one, traditional and identity in one nation would gradually disappear. Second, the disappearance of domestic languages renders the loss of customs, festivals, and social norms in a country that requires strictly conservation. In fact, humanity has to avoid eroding the diversity of culture, which ensures the richness of human life.
In conclusion, while the same global language can have various merits, I concur that an international one is fraught to pitfalls. In addition, both governments and citizens need to treasure their languages as a form of tangible cultural heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
- Encouraging people to use public transport is the best way to solve traffic problems in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is negative or positive development 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ternational one is fraught to pitfalls. In addition, both governments and citizens...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26821192053 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03367103509 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592715231788 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2928731431 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170869405002 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569552311879 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288193260667 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103746740688 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211180943513 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ternational one is fraught to pitfalls. In addition, both governments and citizens...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26821192053 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03367103509 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592715231788 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2928731431 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170869405002 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569552311879 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288193260667 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103746740688 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211180943513 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.