Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. What are the advantage and disadvantage of this prediction? Do you agree or disagree?
It is scientifically claimed that in the future, humans will use the same language in any regions of the world for daily communication. In this essay, I am going to analyze both these advantages and disadvantages of this opinion before stating my personal perspective.
On the one hand, one of the main benefits of having a global language is that it will enhance the quality of work in all workplaces where people from different countries labor together such as multi-national companies had factories. They will not struggle to grasp others’ messages as they can easily discuss using the same language. For instance, multi-cultural companies will no longer suffer from language barriers which results in several conflicts and misunderstanding between employees. Another advantage is the development of education as students do not have to learn two or three languages simultaneously. In some countries, the curriculum will not combine learning both mother tongue and foreign language so children can have concentrate only on one type of language to master it quickly.
On the other hand, it is obvious that using the same language is the culprit of numerous consequences. Firstly, this would over the time put minority languages on the verge of extinction because no part of the world continues speaking them. For example, Ukrainian now is used by native speakers interiorly in Ukraine so of course it would vanish if there existed a global language. Secondly, in some cases, people cannot adopt completely a shared language due to the discrepancies in culture. Therefore, they seem to create a mixture of two languages to satisfy their own use. This leads to the lost of linguistic purity in both cultures.
In my opinion, I strongly believe that despite some dangers caused, using them same language all over the world is rather beneficial. It will help to reduce the gap between the countries as there is no communication barrier. A stronger relationship between the nations will be definitely formed.
In conclusion, the advantages of using the same language in the far-away future such as improving quality of work or better education outweigh the disadvantages. Governments should take this prediction into consideration to operate as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-14 | letcallmemit | 78 | view |
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 61
- Sonme people think the best way to solve traffiic congestion in cities is to provide freepublic transport 24 hours a day 7 days a week Is it good or bad to what extent do you agree 89
- Multi cultural societies in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people bring more benfits than drawbacks to a country To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison when relevant 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever thay like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those rrelated to science and technology Dicuss both these views and 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ration to operate as soon as possible.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26721763085 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06691630287 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567493112948 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1018007476 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254571098609 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747433854789 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395623808387 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144628145178 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431741371157 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.