The method of study has been a trending topic for people to debate in recent years. Many individuals say that studying in groups will bring a lot of benefits for students whereas others suppose that studying alone is a better measure. From my perspective, the former opinion seems to be a feasible studying method for the following reasons.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that self-studying is a phenomenal way to teach pupils to become more independent. Because of the massive range of amenities and supportive items for study, students now can surf the internet to research furthermore to their studies instead of depending on teachers, parents, or friends like in the past. Additionally, study alone also help pupils to concentrate more on the courses that they are learning. Friends are frequently making teenagers not totally focus on their studies which leads to the unexpected results of tests. Thus, self-studying is an efficient measure to force adolescents to focus on their studies.
On the other hand, despite many positive impacts of studying alone, group learning is still a more effective solution of study for children. Apparently, studying in groups is a profound learning method to practice student’s teamwork inspirations. Even though pupils might not feel comfortable expressing their ideas in groups, it is a solution to make students become wonderful listeners who always lend an ear to their teammates and put their collective to be a priority, compared to self-studying which can make them become selfish regarding express their opinion. Furthermore, studying in groups also helps students to have better communication skills on account of the interactions with their teammates to broaden their knowledge. Therefore, lean in groups is a better studying method.
To sum up, each learning method has both sides. Although self-studying brings many perks such as concentration or independence, learning in groups is still a more sufficient measure of study as it trains pupil’s communication skills and also their inspirational of teamwork activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39449541284 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04329441591 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547400611621 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9768663408 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353746837081 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139725779837 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774928678681 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232970322158 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865335752391 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.