Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming?
There has been a controversy about who should solve the danger of global warming. Some environmentalists suggest that this issue should have the involvement of international community, while some politicians oppose to the suggestion and put forward that each country should deal with global warming alone. In my opinion, I completely agree that the international community should take part in tackling the warning of global warming.
Ealier researches show that some risk factors which are related to climate change may be overstated. Sea levels now are thought to rise by one metre, contrary to two metres like some scientists’ views. This is because some glaciers and ice sheets seem to be contracting, such as Arctic, while others appear to be expanding, Antarctic, for example. In addition, gulfstream is thought to be unlikely to vanish.
However, those researches do not mean that global warming is not a serious problem since its consequences have been seen obviously. For instance, the acreage of tropical forests is believed to be vulnerable to drought more than ever. Besides, hurricanes and typhoons are now more severe. Not only environment, people’s health are also affected by global warming. It leads to heat-related illnesses and death, and spread of infectious diseases. Therefore, greater efforts should be made to protect inhabitants and environment from global warming.
In conclusion, it is irresponsible to do nothing about global warming. In spite of the good news of aforementioned factors, which are overstated, global warming continues to be a concern. To solve the problem, international community is considered to be more believed than government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | HeyGungOri | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | astu | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Nina_OY | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
- Is there any value in studying academic subjects that are not useful in terms of generating wealth for the country 73
- The inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before What do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap 89
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am is thought to be unlikely to vanish. However, those researches do not mean th...
^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and environment from global warming. In conclusion, it is irresponsible to do...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44827586207 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1046825983 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4354199134 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322243368291 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09366310469 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850099261691 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197926361701 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123487458514 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.