The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. Overall, expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the three years while that on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend and teachers’ payment always topped the charts.
Two decades witnessed a significant rise in the spending on insurance, increasing from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. Meanwhile, the amount of money on teachers’ salaries went up to 45% from 40%, with a peak at 50% in 1991. Also, the expense on furniture climbed to 23% from 15%, with a great dip at 5% in 1991.
However, during the twenty years the amount of money on other workers’ salaries experienced a decrease from 28% to 15%. The twenty years saw a drop in resources e.g. books from 15% to 9%, with a rise at 20% in 1991.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 Sandhu param 73 view
2020-01-25 Noah1997 33 view
2020-01-22 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 73 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 67 view
Essays by user Frank Chen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80625 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91166162826 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4060382677 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193139604965 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998445930864 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128856070709 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124251687609 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910168484206 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.