Should we allow GM Food? Give reasons to support your opinion.
In the information age, some opinions argued that GM food is good because it brings to farmers more extra income and reduce the risk of natural disasters. In the meanwhile, others think that there are numerous adverse consequences which customers can receive in the future. In my opinion, I consider that farmers should balance between two sides their benefits and customers' benefit, they should lean into any sides.
On the one hand, a growing body of research suggests that one of five jobs which earn the least salary is farmers. Therefore, researchers have a tendency to create some invents so that farmers could utilize these ones and boost their life quality, and GM food is born. Besides that, it will be more straightforward for any farmers about their crops which must face natural disasters. Only these two strengths can enhance farmers' life quality and make them more salary on their budget. This means that they can have a better life and pay more daily expenses for themselves. Taking Vietnam as an example, more than 63% of farmers in there have a better life because of profound invents, especially science invents.
On the other hand, there are a plethora of weaknesses in GM food. Although it can boost their farmers' life, the bad effects of GM food in the future to the customers are controversial. Let look back about the pretty same invents which improve farmers' life in the past, there are a lot of cases which kill the life of very many people. To be more clear, if customers use a lot of GM food products, they can not prolong their life expectancy, even it can deteriorate their health much at young age. Therefore, individuals do not completely have any beneficial reasons to use products which contain GM food even though until now, there is no proof about the bad impacts of GM food on people. Taking any underdeveloped countries around the world as an example, they truly use a lot of such products from the past until now. They become people who are lack of awareness, knowledge and their life are too short to live and dedicate. Nonetheless, they are poor so they must accept this situation as a destiny and they suffer from that on a daily basis. It can easy to understand that everyone do not want to try this products which contain genetic modification because of those.
In conclusion, every invent have both pros and cons so sellers (farmers) can balance between customers' benefits and their benefits to apply enough GM food products into the market. In my opinion, I suppose that everyone have every different choice, they can decide to buy any food based on their interests and demands. Obviously, there are a lot of the poor. so they have to save money to save their life in lieu of splurging money on unnecessary pieces of stuff like original products. I think that we can enable GM food to buy in the markets because there are numerous individuals who need to use those products for living their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ch customers can receive in the future. In my opinion, I consider that farmers sho...
^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...e invents so that farmers could utilize these ones and boost their life quality, and GM fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun GM seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of (GM)'.
Suggestion: a lot of (GM)
...ple. To be more clear, if customers use a lot of GM food products, they can not prolong the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... the past until now. They become people who are lack of awareness, knowledge and their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rstand that everyone do not want to try this products which contain genetic modifica...
^^^^
Line 4, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...Obviously, there are a lot of the poor. so they have to save money to save their l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, i suppose, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 513.0 315.596192385 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49531553866 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471734892788 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 771.3 506.74238477 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3915307963 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.652173913 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3043478261 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137546366279 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465885254464 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05770034671 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988438548667 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444434954158 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.