Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer
nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the
responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their
citizens themselves?
A nation’s wealth is primarily driven by the people in the form of GDP. A wealthy nation accumulated wealth either by abundant stores of natural resources or by setting up industries, business that amass vast wealth for the growth of the nation. The question raised by the author whether rich nations should share their wealth with poor nations or look after them by providing basic food and education should be decided by the government of wealthy nation purely on the wish of the citizens of the nation. As mentioned above, a country’s GDP is driven by every hardworking citizen, so whether to share their hard-earned money or provide basic amenities or completely nothing should be a collective peoples and peoples chosen government representative’s decision.
However, the idea of sharing the wealth could be extremely unacceptable. It not hurts the sentiments of people coming from wealthy nation but it could also hurt the self esteem of the people from the wealthy nation. As a citizen it would not be acceptable to me to share the wealth of my country collected from citizens like me in form of tax are given in form of donation to other country. A better option could be that the wealthy nations can offer business relations with the poorer country or the poorer countries can take a first step to approach wealthy nation to build business relations with such countries. The government of the poor nations must look at speciality of their country. It could be in the form of tourism , in the form natural resources, skills of the citizens, etc. In such way not only will it strengthen their economy, but also provide better employment opportunities and a better lifestyle to its citizens. An overall growth in economy can help in various sectors such as better healthcare, education, tourism, business, etc.
There also could be an instance where the the wealthy nations share a part their wealth to the poorer countries on humanitarian basis so that government can provide its citizens standard amenities but the government could be misusing it. There could be high possibility that instead of doing betterment of their citizens the government could be investing or funding terrorist organizations, lending them support and assurance. In a scenario like this showing empathy on humanitarian grounds could backfire and give rise to terror and hinder world peace
In order to support my stance, I firmly disagree with the suggestion of giving away hard earned wealth for free even on humanitarian basis. It should ideally be acceptable only for once if the country has just hit a huge human or natural crisis or given the situation of the current pandemic. Providing on regular basis wont only make the citizens of poor nation lazy but such nations could also turn out to be ungrateful. As the saying goes “There is no elevator for success, You have to take the ladder’.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-06 | Shohista | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | niloya | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | ishanimody | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | sattar_iust | 75 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | vsundar | 73 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 18
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 27
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tas 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of the people from the wealthy nation. As a citizen it would not be acceptable to...
^^
Line 2, column 727, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntry. It could be in the form of tourism , in the form natural resources, skills ...
^^
Line 2, column 729, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry. It could be in the form of tourism , in the form natural resources, skills of...
^^
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resources, skills of the citizens, etc. In such way not only will it strengthen ...
^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... There also could be an instance where the the wealthy nations share a part their weal...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... There also could be an instance where the the wealthy nations share a part their weal...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ut to be ungrateful. As the saying goes “There is no elevator for success, You ha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98964803313 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7579077059 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469979296066 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5211774265 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466064339152 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150873069606 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129036228764 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293315134866 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114990229546 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.