Some accept state-of-the-art innovation creating holes in between rich and needy individuals.while others oppose the idea. differentiate the two approach and offer your input.
It is often argued by some that, ultra-modern products make a huge gap between the wealthy and poorest people in the country. while others argue that it would not have any issues. However, this essay intends to explain both views.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why people believe innovation would lead to a-holes in society. Firstly, every citizen is not enough to cope with the changing development to fulfill as a result they would have an inferiority complex and that may lead to discrimination in the country itself. For instance, wealthy people often use high-quality smartphones like apple whereas many of them could not afford that. Secondly, innovation makes inflation such as the improvised quality leads to extreme pressure on the companies, and health sectors, to increase the rate, and charges of services. this also would lead to major consequences. For example, advanced hospital services, modern machinery, novel gadgets, and household products also produce controversy among people. Such as, many common people could not afford the rate to the core.
Nevertheless, innovative products are inevitable in our daily life and even in society. Many products make people's life easier than before and mitigate the problems to some extent. Even though some futuristic products are expensive, the government can help needy people to achieve unavoidable things in the long run. Similarly, many household products and gadgets could help people to save time, and maintain life a balance and it is necessary at some point in life. There are many options for the citizen to manage the situation like EMI service, loan, and installment.
To sum up, state-of-the-art products are helping the nation tremendously rather than creating holes inside the country. In my perception, people can mitigate their lower feeling in many other ways with the support of the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some that, ultra-modern products make a huge gap between the wealthy and poorest...
^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...lthy and poorest people in the country. while others argue that it would not have any...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lthy and poorest people in the country. while others argue that it would not have any...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ease the rate, and charges of services. this also would lead to major consequences. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73272727667 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4784723419 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5882352941 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0990769509781 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033399733607 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376338686018 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715950410652 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329683431376 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.