Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based.
In this contemporary epoch, charitable trust plays an indispensable role to protect and assist the masses of society as well as the environment. Moreover, society has the idea that charity should aid every well-being of the world while others reject this notion and suggest that only people of the particular nation should benefit from where the trust is from. The reasons to back my concord will be discussed further in the essay with pertinent examples.
To commence with, there are predominant reasons behind helping those who live in the country where the charitable organization based on this is because Local civilians have enormous contribution in standing such charity. Additionally, People pay taxes and funds in their countries, so it will beneficial for them. To elucidate, Globally, people believe that their funds should be utilized in providing better education to deprived people by giving them books and classes. As a result, there will be escalating numbers of literates. Furthermore, it will possess long-term advantages to particular nation.
On the other hand, there are also ubiquitous reasons for helping every human no matter where they live. Firstly, It is the imperative duty of every country to help one another in detrimental situations to save mother earth. for instance, If a huge fire happens in the world gigantic forest and the species of animals and plants are extinct. a single nation's charity would not able to effort to restore the gems of the environment. Consequences, in these kinds of situation all the organizations contribute their share in the arduous periods.
To recapitulate this, I reckon that it is vital to invest in the nation for the betterment but it is also pivotal to assist other nations in other to solve the environmental issue which indirectly helps us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-02 | drmona.914 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-23 | Amityy | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 11
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 67
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based 67
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...mental situations to save mother earth. for instance, If a huge fire happens in the...
^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...cies of animals and plants are extinct. a single nations charity would not able t...
^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nimals and plants are extinct. a single nations charity would not able to effort to res...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, i reckon, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18027210884 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83929679237 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608843537415 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9694286123 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318601505943 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832642616554 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970120528132 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161808859963 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553136179739 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.