some believe that countries around the world should have a moral obligation to help each other, while others think it is unncessary because money is misused by the governments that receive it.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The widening gap between wealthy and underdeveloped countries has led to an opinion being divided as whether providing international aid for needy countries will be of benefit to them or not, due to the fear of such aid being misused. Despite such concern mainly stemming from corrupted states of recipient countries, provision of money or material resources in aid should not be withheld.
The proponents of the former view about the possibility of international help being utilized for wrong purposes often predicate their thinking on the fact that less developed countries, by and large, do not have a rigorous system of checks and balances to ensure the proper use of such relief. Therefore, should a country be unable to manage donations from international community, the ultimate goals for these resources will not be fully attained, thus leaving the residents’ needs unmet. Nevertheless, this misuse can instead raise awareness of the global community to a venal regime and pressure it to better its governmental system.
The advocates of the latter view strongly believe that Humanitarian aid is a moral imperative, reflecting the international responsibility to aid those disadvantaged members and victims of natural hazards. Apparently, this aid is absolutely essential to the homeless and of high utility in enabling a devastated country to quickly return to their normal state after major disturbances. This is evident in Haiti where with annual humanitarian relief obtain worldwide, the victims of disasters, such as tsunami and floods, can rapidly recover and rebuild their homeland, which would have cost them many decades to do so without the transnational charitable contributions. More Significantly, this activity is also an instrument to promote peace and security between countries, as not only can it reduce disparity in the material standard of living, but also increase cultural and economic interaction among them, thereby effectively defusing tension.
in conclusion, it is undeniable that occasionally, a donor country’s assistance can be abused; however, the role of it is not only to deliver urgent assistance to populations but also to strengthen relations between countries.
- The advancement of internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people think that the best way to get news is through the newspaper while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The culture of different countries is becoming increasingly similar so there is no point for people to go traveling abroad as they could have the same experience at home Do you agree or disagree 93
- some people believe that damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of the improvement of living standards Do you agree or disagree 11
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to be' or 'be'.
Suggestion: to be; be
...t the possibility of international help being utilized for wrong purposes often predi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...atural hazards. Apparently, this aid is absolutely essential to the homeless and of high utility in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hereby effectively defusing tension. in conclusion, it is undeniable that occas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53235294118 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1543497183 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614705882353 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1877475087 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.1 106.682146367 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 20.7667163134 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884557186368 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351211198911 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214809059125 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506175590138 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213702077924 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.0946893788 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 50.2224549098 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.