Some believe that more academic subjects such as chemistry, physics and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both views and provide your own opinion with relevant examples.
Today, the question of whether students should learn academic subjects regarding chemistry,physics and history more than practical subjects such as motor mechanics and cooking or not has been raising a great deal of public attention. Although learning academic subjects appears some disadvantages, I strongly believe the attractive wil be far more significant.
One of the most obvious advantages of practical subjects is that it creates students own opportunities to make a living as soon as possible without commiting 4 years of colleges. For example, a student joining vocational courses could have a grasp of practical skills and work experience which makes them to be able to join to manual works. Therefore, students could have a opportunity to support themselves and raise their family.
Despite some attractives of practical subjects, I still claim that academic areas are conducive to people by helping students to land decent jobs with handsome salaries in the future. For example, a student who is taught about fundamental theories is highly likely to get complex jobs which requires a deeper understanding about the nature of subjects. In addition, a decent educational system would strenghthen laborforce, qualify employees and boost work productivity which is likely to boost growth in national budgets, thus builds sustainable development of a country.
In conclusion, although the demerits of academic subjects, I sill firmly believe academic subjects play an important role in human life. By learning studiously, students could gain a wealth of specialised knowledge and land a decent jobs in the future.
- Some believe that more academic subjects such as chemistry physics and history should be taught in schools while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects such as motor mechanics and cooking Discuss both views 61
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 73
- Climate change is a big environment problem that has become a critical in last couple of decades Some poeple claim that people should stp burning fussil fuels and use only alternative resources such as solar wind powrer Others say that oil gas and coal ar 73
- Global warming is the most pressing problem in the world nowadays What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Today, the question of whether students should learn academic subjects...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , physics
...rn academic subjects regarding chemistry,physics and history more than practical subject...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...l works. Therefore, students could have a opportunity to support themselves and r...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.508 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06356393764 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8682866464 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.7 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269073826749 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979949744645 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976619714767 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162039924523 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13210154519 0.056905535591 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.