Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skill.
What are the causes of this and suggest possible solutions to this problem
It is true that the lack of personal vital soft skills in the freshman of some businesses has become an increasingly widespread concern. Several reasons have resulted from this tendency and they should be tackled by a number of effective solutions.
The phenomenon can be attributed to a principal reason. Focusing on academic training instead of practical skills in tertiary education effect directly on enlarging youngster’s vocational knowledge. Take Vietnam as a prime example for pumping huge amount of money into a select group of top-tier institutions in recent years to enhance cognitive thinking of students by broadening some master courses rather than encourage the young to participate in extra-curricular activities, leading to the shortage of skilled workers in the labor market. Although young people who are fully educated, they face the risk of unemployment since most enterprises require employees to apply the sort of social knowledge in earning money, which helps them progress in their career.
Nevertheless, this issue can be alleviated, provided that some reasonable steps are taken. First, it is necessary to require vocational training as a compulsory part of higher education by changing the transmission of knowledge. If the number of irrelevant subjects it cut down and the school syllabus becomes more practical, young people have chances to enhance their curriculum vitae by obtaining social values. Second, some businesses take responsibility for organizing social activities to improve the solve-problem ability of freshmans. For instance, by getting involved in voluntary projects, workers able to strengthen the relationship with other colleagues, leading to a friendly effective environment for these institutions and individuals as well.
In conclusion, reasons related to the lack of vocational knowledge in universities lead to its demerits on the social ability of employees. However, schools and companies can take immediate steps to address this issue.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economicallyDo you think the advantages overweigh its advantages? 61
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 78
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 78
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why do they do that? Who benefit more from this, the community or these young people. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67333333333 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16435705248 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623333333333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4235569248 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155782833795 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051695946446 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436575057572 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976706905943 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356024251863 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.