It is becoming more and more popular that some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. From technology to the economic development aspect, we should admit that it is the consequence of the rapidly changing society's reconstruction of families today. The human world has already developed to this level. When some children today can not live without smartphones, we should know there are side effects. However, as we live in this technology-led society, we should embrace the future as we accept radios and televisions. Thus, as my concern, children spending hours on smartphones is a more positive development. I will elaborate on my views as follows.
To begin with, every generation of people has its living background. We have also been through a world without computers. When I was young, computers appeared in every family in my country. At that time, another topic also said that some children spend hours daily on their computers. What an exciting world! We, as children, doubted that we were playing too much time on computer games. I played a lot, but most of the time was allowed by my parents since my assignments were submitted. Nowadays, especially after the outbreak of COVID-19, all the children in my country had to take online classes due to the great pandemic. At this time, few people doubted that children took much time on computers because they had to. As time goes on, the computer is changed to a smartphone, but the debate continues. Admittedly, computers were used to play games most when I was young. My great interest in coding was established then, invoking my passion for computer science.
Every coin has two sides. Now that smartphones are on the stage, some children can not control themselves and always take their smartphones in their little hands. For one thing, we should know why they want to take so much time on it: for games, cartoons, and socializing needs since their friends may also use smartphones on the other side of the screen. So can they drop the phones and sit in front of the computers? However, smartphones are more convenient. For example, some children's hands may be too small to type on keyboards. So this is our world now, we should learn some lessons from the computer age. If we limit the time the children use smartphones, they may lose interest and curiosity like we did when we sat in front of computers. The world is developing faster and faster with technology; we should not set so many limits on our children since the next Steve Jobs, the next Elon Musk, will come from them.
At last, people may question whether there are adverse effects like children's eyesight will get damaged by too much time using smartphones. I should get back to my point that the new screen technology is on the way out to labs to the customers, which does little harm to human eyes. That is to say, what we are concerned about right now may be a piece of cake in the future.
To conclude, although there are adverse developments that some children spend hours every day on their smartphones, we should not hold the wheels of history. The positive effects of that will win at last.
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 56
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening what can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 89
- You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letterdescribe the situationexplain why you cannot continue at this timesay what action yo 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for one thing, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 62.0 24.0651302605 258% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2606.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 544.0 315.596192385 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79044117647 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62934997542 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481617647059 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 16.0721442886 199% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4147750658 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4375 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 3.4128256513 440% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236236591618 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685448636685 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079197272526 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160525767473 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964576748241 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.