Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Nowadays, children are becoming increasingly dependent on their smartphones. There are several reasons why young people like this. In my perspective, although this phenomenon could have both positive and negative consequences, but I would agree that there are far more drawbacks.
There are various reasons why children spend hours on their phones on a daily basic. One of the primary reasons is that they are captivated by video games that are more and more popular nowadays. Game developers often pay attention to young people, particularly teenagers or even children, who have a lot of time to relax and use their cell phones to play games. They have a host of staffs and experts to draw children attention and make them addictive. Another reason could be that other pastimes are not interesting. It is clear that outside of the school day, children do not have much space or playground to enjoy. It is difficult for them because the limited time and it is not easy to access or even, they have to pay money to join in. Therefore, their phones are a good solution. Children can do everything they want and enjoy their hobbies on their phones.
There are both positive and negative effects of this trend. The advantages could be improving some skills related to familiar with new technologies, taking advantage of leisure time effectively. Besides, there are a lot of drawbacks that using hours on a cell phone bring. Firstly, it would have some problems related to eyes. It is true that spending a lot of time a day on screen is one of the main reasons of the issue. Moreover, children could be distracted with other important tasks such as doing homework, communicating with friends and family members.
In conclusion, children spend hours on their phones to study or learn some new skills or do something like that. It would be a good way to use smartphones but I believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | lethianhthu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88414634146 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71488039336 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1027189216 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2993355802 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874072014525 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712958575281 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185388661546 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217600116057 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88414634146 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71488039336 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1027189216 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2993355802 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874072014525 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712958575281 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185388661546 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217600116057 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.