In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.
What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
Today, severe traffic is one of the primary concerns in many urban locations across the globe. I am convinced that the root causes/the main culprits of this are related to overcrowding and poor public transport systems, which can be solved through proper laws and policies.
Heavy traffic/The situation is attributed to several fundamental reasons. One convincing reason would be the overpopulation of metropolitan areas when more people tend to settle in urban areas for better employment opportunities. The more city dwellers there are, the higher the number of traffic participants, causing considerable rush-hour traffic. Another reason might be the increased utilization of personal vehicles. In many cities recently, pickpocketing and declining conditions have made public transportation increasingly unreliable and inconvenient for users. What is more, it appears to be a waste of time and inflexible. While driving personal vehicles may allow users greater flexibility in arranging their work, individuals who take the bus must travel to the closest bus station and wait a long time to board the bus.
Several appropriate/necessary measures can be taken to address/eliminate this problem. First of all, anti-urbanization strategies should be employed/implemented. More factories need to be built/introduced to provide work for the undeveloped sections of the rural areas, restricting the movement of people to cities. Secondly, increasing the dependability of public transportation might be one way to encourage individuals to abandon their cars in favor of the bus or train. Concessionary pricing should also be implemented to promote the use of public transportation.
In conclusion, population growth and inadequate public transportation are the two culprits of thick traffic. Therefore, policies to encourage the use of public transit and support counter-urbanization can be effective solutions for this problem.
283 words.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | linh allie | 56 | view |
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- Many people believe that motorbikes should be banned Do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph shows the information for internet users as percentage of population in three countries from 1999 and 2009 78
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as for, in conclusion, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84561403509 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.70514686155 2.80592935109 132% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4425531327 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223952352116 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680061319702 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698676058789 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137385002346 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194319187318 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as for, in conclusion, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84561403509 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.70514686155 2.80592935109 132% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4425531327 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223952352116 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680061319702 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698676058789 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137385002346 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194319187318 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.