In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.
What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
Today, it is widely believed that one of the primary concerns of citizens in many urban locations across the globe is severe traffic. I am convinced that the root causes of this are overcrowding and the high expense of vehicles, which can be solved by the law of the authorities and policies.
The traffic has been consistently increasing due to several fundamental causes. The overpopulation of metropolitan areas would be the most convincing reason. The more city dwellers there are, the higher the number of traffic participants, which will cause considerable rush-hour traffic. Another reason might be the increased utilization of personal vehicles. In recent years, pickpocketing and declining conditions have made public transportation increasingly unreliable and inconvenient for users. Especially, it appears to be a waste of time and inflexible. For instance, although driving a personal vehicle may allow users greater flexibility in arranging their work, individuals who take the bus must travel to the closest bus station and wait a long time to board the bus.
Many beneficial measures should be taken to address this problem. The government must first support the anti-urbanization strategy. To provide work for the undeveloped sections of the rural areas, restricting the movement of people, many investors, for example, should establish their startups or numerous manufacturing facilities. As a result, there will be less traffic on the roads. Secondly, increasing the dependability of public transportation might be one way to encourage individuals to abandon their cars in favor of the bus or train. Concessionary pricing should also be implemented to promote the use of public transportation.
In conclusion, traffic congestion is a crucial issue in cities and towns around the world these days. It is mostly caused by population growth and inadequate public transportation. However, there are a variety of measures the government could take to solve the issue, including encouraging more users to use public transit, lowering the costs, and supporting counter-urbanization.
320 words.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
- The line graph shows the information for internet users as percentage of population in three countries from 1999 and 2009 78
- Many people think that bottled water should be banned Do you agree or disagree 93
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 56
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as would be the most convincing reason. The more city dwellers there are, the highe...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and wait a long time to board the bus. Many beneficial measures should be taken...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57763975155 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35213311488 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611801242236 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.3916301167 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193670526565 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565406979642 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683939805491 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116028552974 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328767028033 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.