Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
Some people build their home in a short area but make's their home larger. But others focus to build their home in a large free space. In my point of view, I think houses should be shorter or medium in size but there should be free space around houses .so i am with the second thought.
Building a large house is not environment friendly. Creating large size buildings to stay in is not a good decision. It will be not comfortable to stay the whole life. But it will be a good decision for making long buildings for any hotel purpose. That means it will be good to stay in a large building to pass anyone's leisure weekend. Also, a large building has many risks. If the tenth floor is attacked by fire and there is no space around the building then how fire service will clear the fire if their equipments can't go up to that level and they don't get enough space. Recently in Dhaka, the top portion of the Bashundhara building was attacked by fire but there is no space around that building so fire service came but they can't do anything, and some people who were on that floor they died.
On the contrary, if someone builds his home on a large free space then they will get the perfect environment to stay there. Also, the small children who will leave there can get a space to play and enjoy their leisure time which is needed for them to grow in a healthy path. And pass their leisure time with their friends. And the main facility it builds home on a wider area of land is,if the building got fire because of an accident then there will be much space for the fire service to remove the fire.
So, in the conclution, I want to say in every condition large buildings have less chance to sustain especially in the case of earthquake but small buildings with large free space can face an uncertain event
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: medium
...ew, I think houses should be shorter or medium in size but there should be free space around h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...there should be free space around houses .so i am with the second thought. Buildi...
^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... should be free space around houses .so i am with the second thought. Building a...
^
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...will clear the fire if their equipments cant go up to that level and they dont get e...
^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ments cant go up to that level and they dont get enough space. Recently in Dhaka, th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 732, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... building so fire service came but they cant do anything, and some people who were o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...t builds home on a wider area of land is,if the building got fire because of an acc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, then, i think, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33727810651 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17400669304 2.80592935109 77% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4828726532 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209894642316 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844768727962 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660777104593 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132500036616 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510936605906 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 12.4159519038 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.58950901804 77% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.