Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
People have different viewpoints toward the construction of the residence. While there are people advocating the project of setting up a wider area for dwellers, I suppose that tall buildings would be more favorable as people nowadays can purchase whatever they want with the help of the national economic growth.
There are several reasons why high-rise buildings are more beneficial to inhabitants. Generally, skyscrapers are established as living places in which consist of a variety of stages that possess spectacular views when people witness the whole metropolitan cities from the windows. Therefore, those who are attracted by houses having magnificent scenes will undoubtedly end up buying one to satisfy their go-to pleasure. Another reason is that tall buildings do not require an enormous amount of acreage, therefore there will be more places for the constitution of social facilities such as a recreational park where people can gather around. Such areas can help contribute to the development of children and strengthen cohesion among inhabitants.
On the other hand, I believe that houses appear to be better to some extent. Although tall buildings can indeed save up more space for other purposes, they become hazardous when it comes to emergencies while people choosing land houses can improvise more easily. For instance, when a fire occurs, high-rise blocks have to confront more risks such as limited evacuation due to the density of the population that high-rise blocks possess, leading to not only citizens' health but also a decrease in the value of skyscrapers themselves. Nevertheless, broadening land for the establishment of houses place high pressure on the environment and people's lives. Trees and soils are the main elements that act as deterrents against natural disasters. Therefore, if deforestation and erosion take place, the damage to agriculture, the economy and other essential sectors of a nation is more likely to happen.
In conclusion, while land houses can possess some benefits such as privacy, it seems to me that vertical cities are more favorable since they can house more inhabitants and prevent the environment from degradation at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | lilin_ | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | rafsanfardin | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the internet While the Internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted 89
- Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths To prevent such road accidents the government should ban people under 24 from driving motorcycles To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Today s teenagers have more stressful lives than previous generations Discuss this view and give your own opinion 50
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 89
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to land'
Suggestion: to land
...es to emergencies while people choosing land houses can improvise more easily. For i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ise blocks possess, leading to not only citizens health but also a decrease in the value...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36811594203 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88853923207 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8886408725 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202448300465 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721707566137 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661799104356 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127167933289 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362992070294 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.