In many countries, more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions, microwave ovens and rice cooker. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the application of new technologies is one of the most important ways of living convenient. It is common for people to buy a wide range of household goods in many countries. From my perspective, my view is that purchasing household goods is a positive development, for the following reason.
Using household goods makes our life more efficiency. This is because household appliance can automate repetitive task such as washing dishes, doing laundry which means that we will have more time to enjoy our life instead of doing a large number of housework. For example, it is washing machine that have eliminated the time washing clothes, which has freed up lots of time to spend on other activities, such as chatting with friends, playing with family members.
Moreover, there is no doubt that buying household machines can promote economic growth. More specifically, buying a wide range of household products will stimulate the market demand for those products, which generates more profit for related industries that contribute to the economic growth.
It is also true that buying a wide range of household goods maybe lead to some problems like environmental problems. There are, of course, household appliances normally requires the use of electricity which needs the use of fossil fuels of produce that will increase the greenhouse gas emission and aggravate the problem of air pollution. But this problem can be solve with developing environmental-friendly appliances.
In conclusion, although there are some problems for people to buy many household products, we have many methods to figure out it. Therefore, I firmly believe that buying a wide range of household goods is a positive of development because it can make our lives more efficiency and drive economic development.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions microwave ovens and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Indiciduals can do nothing to improve the environment only government and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discus both these views and give your own 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...time to enjoy our life instead of doing a large number of housework. For example, it is washing m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00807428925 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8316361719 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312337474875 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123350461878 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909096022595 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18101171255 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571658889533 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.