Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, due to globalization, international awards, especially in sport fields, have emerged as a topic of interest. It is believed that some nations should focus on equipment upgrades for their professional athletes instead of supplying equipment suitable for everyone. From my perspective, it is a practical opinion and I will explain it in the paragraphs below.
Firstly, it is obvious that if the government develops facilities for their sportspersons, they would receive a much more professional environment and their training could also reach a higher result to a certain extent. For instance, in football, given the fact that Viet Nam national pitches do not stand at the same quality as most others in the world. This is because of the lack of investment in upgrading equipment for proficient football clubs. However, if they take more focus on them, they can totally create a much better experience for their footballers. This would not only facilitate them to play on a more quality pitch, but also help them reduce injuries caused by friction with the football court. Additionally, it can also result in the increase in the quality of training for players as well as helping them prepare better for their matches in the international arena.
Secondly, providing suitable sport facilities for everyone can result in the abundance of public equipment and the wastage of state coffers. It is clear that not everyone has the need to play sports at home, let alone in public. Moreover, in some regions, there are many public areas for playing basketball with a wide space and pre-installed hoops. But instead of using it for its original purposes, many people choose these places just to let their hair down by playing with their kites or kittens. However, although not all people intend on using public sport equipment, after several years, the government still has responsibility for fixing and renovating them with large amounts of money.
In conclusion, I agree that improving facilities for professional purposes with an aim to victory in the international arena is more practical and necessary than spending money for creating public sport equipment for all people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18980169972 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87469116962 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552407932011 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0885838309 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14588968849 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532777748906 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496360321416 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936730721415 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275546357765 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.