Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Comparing to the countries that offering the sport facilities to the public, some countries only offers the elite athletes with professional sports facilities. The fundamental meaning of building the specialised facilities is to facilitate the athletes to competing for the award and honors in the international sports fair. Therefore, the advantages of exclusive use for athletes is greater than offering to the common people.
The discussion will divided into 2 sections. Firstly, training the top athlete and wining the prize is not only the honor for the individual but also the reflection of the country's power and strenghth. Wining the award in the worldwide has brought enormous attention to the country and also stimulate the sports-related business value such as sponsorship from foreigh enterprise. In addition, the effect on the public is also another reason of wining the award. Stories behind the athlete is way meaningful to the common people comparing to the prize itself. For instance, Quan Hongchan, a young female diver that made her appearance in the recent years has drawn great attention to the diving sports. She was raised and trained under severe condition but her persistence and talent made her stand out from all the divers, which has educated many athletes in various ways.
As for the disadvantages that may bring to the public will be the inequility for the common people that is also the tax payer. Those who have paid the tax but cannot enjoy the benefit of those infrastructures and facilities may be disappointed on the government. The less beneficiaries of the facilites, the less passion on promoting sports. Taking National Cross Country Centre in China, it is used for the winter Olympics during 2022 and after the event is done, the site is opened for the public and those who are interested in skiing sports.
In summary, specialised facilities for the athletes prior using is undoubtedly correct since the benefit is larger. However there will be alternative way to put the facilities in a better use. China has build specialised facilities for those elite but at the same time, it is available for the public use when international fair is closed, which gains a win-win result in terms of the sports passion of the public as well as the profit gaining from maximising the usage of the site.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'divide'
Suggestion: divide
...e common people. The discussion will divided into 2 sections. Firstly, training the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun beneficiaries is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... be disappointed on the government. The less beneficiaries of the facilites, the les...
^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ly correct since the benefit is larger. However there will be alternative way to put th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... gains a win-win result in terms of the sports passion of the public as well as the pr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06735751295 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79502344016 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4826580239 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.058823529 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212532463315 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712078442547 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704043507951 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146060343687 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902264554447 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'divide'
Suggestion: divide
...e common people. The discussion will divided into 2 sections. Firstly, training the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun beneficiaries is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... be disappointed on the government. The less beneficiaries of the facilites, the les...
^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ly correct since the benefit is larger. However there will be alternative way to put th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... gains a win-win result in terms of the sports passion of the public as well as the pr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06735751295 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79502344016 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4826580239 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.058823529 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212532463315 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712078442547 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704043507951 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146060343687 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902264554447 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.