In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life. What are the reasons for this development? What are the effects on society and family life?
A question has been raised over whether there is an upward trend in having children lately of people nowadays. This appears to be the consequence of people’s demand for a perfect life. As long as this issue continues, it can cause drawbacks on the quality of the family tree and impose a burden on the economy and society.
The aspect to consider regarding one of the definitions of a dream life concerns independence in life. It is obvious that the majority of couples wish to spend time with their partners after marriage for such a couple years, where they can show love and share the same habits together. Not only saving time for each other, but they also have to draw attention to working since there are much more things to be considered as a new family. On that basis, having children early prevents people from spending time on work, habits and with people’s spouses. It is clear that a baby needs a lot of care and demand for stuff such as milk and diapers, and the Millennials are too busy to take these things into account promptly.
Therefore, it would be correct to assume that providing this phenomenon persists, problems can be built up for family’s next generations in physical aspects. Many research showed that the older males and females are, the lower the quality of sperms and eggs are supplied. On that basis, late-born children tend to retard or disable physical and mental features, which can be genetic for a long period to the next generation. For a macro perspective, an expanding decrease in the number of high-quality labour forces will lower the work progress and reflect a negative effect on the economy. Furthermore, the government is also required to concentrate more on fundamental systems such as health insurance through the economic depression.
In conclusion, free time makes having children early less attractive to young inhabitants in some countries today and this will bring negative effects on core values of not only a family but also the community. Thus, solutions should be taken into consideration by encouraging people in reproduction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-28 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-28 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | Nguyễn Thị Hoa | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | lennie.butera | 78 | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 78
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: Much research; A good deal of research
...s next generations in physical aspects. Many research showed that the older males and females...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71065010043 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588068181818 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6879064484 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201439254905 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641721329519 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535550929383 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127062129964 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337785886671 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: Much research; A good deal of research
...s next generations in physical aspects. Many research showed that the older males and females...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71065010043 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588068181818 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6879064484 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201439254905 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641721329519 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535550929383 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127062129964 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337785886671 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.