In some countries, celebrities complain about the way the media publicize their private lives. Some people say that they should accept it as part of their fame. To what extent…
The skyrocketing popularization of mass media during the last century has made the news more widespread than ever, especially about famous individuals. This vast coverage includes their private lives as well, as media agencies race to increase their output. Though the practice is downright illegal, consumers pass it off as something celebrities have to cope with, which I find infuriatingly unacceptable.
The act of stalking, also known is paparazzi, unnaturally infringes on others' privacy. This is a clear violation of a person's basic rights, punishable by law. After all, any human needs to have moments for themselves only in order to not expose their sensitive information, or to allow them to fulfill other mental demands without being judged by the society. The fact that businesses exploit this is not only illegal but sickening, considering that the leaked information not only depresses, but also endangers the person. The murder of John Lennon, whose apartment was known to the public, is a reminder of this constant threat caused by media stalking.
Not only that, the leakage of personal details is not a part of one's stardom; I believe otherwise - stalking is only a consequence of greed and the unreasonable curiosity of a fan base. Famous people make a name for themselves with their talents, rather than what they do in secret. Exposing those private pieces mostly form an unnecessarily negative cover on their fame, as fans nitpick on supposedly commoner, or lowly behaviors. I personally do not care much, as long as the person's doings are within limits, and I find no reason to pick on such mundane activities.
Overall, knowing its consequences, the business of spying on famous people should be banned entirely, and any opinions that support it are mere excuses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | Pham Quy Hien | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | chohuzx | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | dann061006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | quynhanh22 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that the personal information of violent criminals should be made available to the public Others think that this information should be protected Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In some countries celebrities complain about the way the media publicize their private lives Some people say that they should accept it as part of their fame To what extent 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... is paparazzi, unnaturally infringes on others privacy. This is a clear violation of a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...s privacy. This is a clear violation of a persons basic rights, punishable by law. After ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ge of personal details is not a part of ones stardom; I believe otherwise - stalking...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...irely, and any opinions that support it are mere excuses.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17182130584 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87601712082 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670103092784 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4847378321 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.30769230769 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178082889823 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544152575354 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616807727159 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950352726768 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049826403888 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.