In some countries, come criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages
There is a controversial statement heating a debate over the fact that should law trials be broadcasted to the public. Personally, I believe that its advantages could outstrip the disadvantages.
These trials could offer multiple merits. Firstly, trials involving criminal activities could promote the transparency of the systems by bringing the victims of crimes to justice and proving that no one is exempt from the coverage of laws and legal proceedings. For example, the trial accusing Nam Cam - a notorious mafia in drug dealing and money lobbying in the early 2000s was broadcasted nationally to show that no individual or organization could hide in the shadow for eternity. Secondly, it could reinforce the belief of the populace on society and the legal systems. People could live peacefully and happily, knowing there is justice above protecting them and the taxes they paid are in good hands.
However, any method has its fair share of flaws. Depicting horrendous trials on television could leave detrimental effects on the children. Observing such vicious and cruel crimes, children could become afraid of the world they are living in and always be anxious whether the environment out there is a safe place for evolving and developing. Moreover, the innocent kids might see these criminals as a model or celebrities, leading to the imitation of actions against the laws and considering it the stepping stone to become famous.
To recapitulate, despite having some negative impacts, I hold a firm belief that these trials could contribute to a better and safer society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | hoangnunbg | 61 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 95
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 89
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 89
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think climate change has a negative impact on business while others think that it provides more business opportunities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25196850394 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84387008811 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637795275591 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0919457114 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123173245177 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045305386134 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347104778781 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786607924342 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236041955305 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.