Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
For decades, animal testing has served as catalysts to create novel medicine and test the safety of the products. However, this approach caused multiple controversies about whether it should be prohibited due to its immorality or it should proceed for humanitarian purposes. Personally, this essay would stay neutral and explain both views
On the one side, animal experiments could contribute to life-saving and treatment. Every drug or medicine before selling in the market have to be tested under scrutiny across multiple phrases, including on animal. In fact, countless cures for chronic and fatal diseases such as cancers, insulin, HIV have been made possible thanks to animal testing. The findings from these researches have saved billion of souls and become the landmark fulcrum for the development of health science. Furthermore, the benefits of animal testing perform even more tangible results in terms of quickly dealing with such epidemics. Animal research has played a critical role in helping researchers understand the virus itself, the mechanics of its transmission, and the safety and efficiency of all the vaccines so far produced to bring the end of the pandemic a step closer.
On the flip side, the clueless and inhumanity unfortunately still exist during animal testing procedures. The number of qualified institutions remains humble; whereas the majority of small institutes could not provide adequate standards for experimental animals. As a result, these species have to suffer from abominable and filthy living conditions. In some cases, researchers want to burn stages to get concrete achievements and underestimate the number of animals needed. These abundant unreliable studies not only have lacked the power to pinpoint the effectiveness of the drugs but also turn million of animals’ death to meaningless. Moreover, the innovations of technology have opened new doors to allow other alternative non-animal methods, addressing the ethical dilemma either for humans or animals.
To recapitulate, even though animal experiments could vitally devote humanity to medical research, I still believe that we should observe at a wider picture to enact and ensure the living rights of other living creatures.
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries come criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 89
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 95
- Some people think climate change has a negative impact on business while others think that it provides more business opportunities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ndings from these researches have saved billion of souls and become the landmark fulcru...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ffectiveness of the drugs but also turn million of animals’ death to meaningless. Moreo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, in fact, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5350877193 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89049396659 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649122807018 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8909624964 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253391201602 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759587987755 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375503222666 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143169881698 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00810392601999 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.