In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opinion
Undoubtedly, In some nations there is huge income disparity among people. Some people are earning astronomical salaries while others even are not able to make both ends and living under poverty. I am disagree with the trend that limit must be imposed on the amount of high salaries, people are earning and i strongly support the view that this is favourable for a country.
On the one hand, Limiting amount of salaries might have detrimental impact on the society and the country as a whole. First of all, In today’s modern society everyone yearning to earn more and more money as they go for diligent studies in prestigious universities to make their career and then pass tests in order to get employed where there is great competition. However, if higher authorities would cap the salaries then people will stop working harder. As a consequent, The economy of the country would go down and people will not struggle to earn higher salaries if there is no hope and legal support.
Secondly, Youngsters may start migrating to other countries in order make their future bright government would not appreciate their efforts and rather put a limit on amount of salaries as in fully progressed nations they would get better employment opportunities and with great hard work they would meet their desires and get success. Hence, In order to develop a country there must be collaboration among administration and its citizens so moving outside can hinder the progress of a nation. Finally, The development of a a nation could be hindered by limiting the amount of salaries as authorities charge high income tax from richer people snd use that amount to establish infrastructure and provide public services. Therefore, people with limited salaries would pay less taxes.
On the other hand, I am advocate of the approach that it is a good for nation. First of all, unlike the phenomenon of liming amount of salaries, Income disparity would encourage people to work harder as poor people would make efforts to compete with rich ones in order to earn salaries like they are earning. As a result, Economy would boost if citizens are contributing the progress of the nation.In addition to this, For the overall development and fairness in the country that only able natives are getting rewards as the people who are working hardest are earning more and vice versa. Consequently, The country will grow when fair rewards are being provided by the government.
To conclude, Although it is thought by some people that government should limit the huge salaries yet i believe that a country might grow if there is disparity as poor ones would burn mid night oil to get success as richer ones
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | andrew.dang | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 71 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
- discuss the causes of global warming and possible solutions for individuals and the government 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- You are going to another country to study You would like to do a part time job while you are studying so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help Write a letter to your friend In your letter give details of your study plans explain why you w 73
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Your best friend just had her first baby You are currently overseas but will be returning to your hometown in a week Write to your friend In your letter congratulate your friend tell her when you will be returning home ask when you could drop in to meet h 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...oth ends and living under poverty. I am disagree with the trend that limit must be impos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...f a nation. Finally, The development of a a nation could be hindered by limiting th...
^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f a nation. Finally, The development of a a nation could be hindered by limiting ...
^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...f a nation. Finally, The development of a a nation could be hindered by limiting th...
^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'advocated'.
Suggestion: advocated
... less taxes. On the other hand, I am advocate of the approach that it is a good for n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...contributing the progress of the nation.In addition to this, For the overall devel...
^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ment should limit the huge salaries yet i believe that a country might grow if th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 452.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96681415929 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64042810179 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477876106195 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0003662101 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.3125 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380241513549 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137845426953 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712592565969 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239449475185 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531073112549 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.