In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
Currently, in some countries, there is an argument over whether should the government apply a higher tax on fast food because more and more people are dealing with health issues as a result of consuming a huge amount of junk food. Personally, I disagree totally with this opinion.
First and foremost, the price of products is not the only reason why so many people consume fast food. Research on healthyme.com showed that most citizens choose junk food because of its convenience. It is reasonable that due to the fast-paced lifestyles today, people tend to choose to eat outside in fast-food restaurants rather than cooking healthy dishes at home because of time-saving. Secondly, for some people, junk food is their only choice. Thanks to the affordable price of fast food, people with money problems like the homeless, students could have a full meal with enough calories in one dish. In addition, even with normal people, the price of healthy food and organic food is too high for citizens to pay.
Another reason why I support the notion that imposing a high tax on fast food have more potential drawbacks than such benefits is that it would slow down the growth of economics. In fact, there are various prestigious and successful companies producing fast food namely Mc. Donal, KFC is making huge profits to the increase of economics. Furthermore, instead of rising the price of junk food, the government could try some possible solutions. The first thing that they could do is pay more attention to managing advertisements. Replacing fast food commercials with videos about a healthy lifestyle or simple tutorials that guide individuals in cooking healthy foods could reduce the consumption of junk food. Finally, fixing the price of organic food help people have more opportunities to purchase these products.
In conclusion, for these two major reasons I mentioned above, I strongly disagree with the fact that government raise the tax on junk food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- Nowasays alarge amount of advertising is aimed at children Some people think this can have negative effects on children and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Today majority of children are raised ny their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working To what extent do you think it affects the whole family 84
- Some people believe that air travel shoulf be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world s fuel resource To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more plastic is polluting cities countrywide and oceans in the world What are the problems caused by plastic wastes what measures should be taken to solve it 84
- Some people think environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however think that those problems cannot be solved unless individuals take some action Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to junk'
Suggestion: to junk
...me.com showed that most citizens choose junk food because of its convenience. It is ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...r reasons I mentioned above, I strongly disagree with the fact that government raise the tax on junk food. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0959752322 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69265849328 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554179566563 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8876961006 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334781595561 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116822560605 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603841526598 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212712517498 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507513503963 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.