In some countries, it is now possible for people to buy products made in other countries. To what extent do the benefits of this development outweigh the problems?
As communication and transportation technologies develop at an unprecedented pace, the economic links between major countries become more and more tight, and globalizaiton has become an inevitable trend. As a result, people have far more access to goods from all over the world than before. This would clearly bring more advantages than disadvantages.
First of all, the quality of ordinary people’s life would dramatically increase because of the abundant oversea products. In the old days, residents can only buy local food and clothes, and have a limited access to new things. But globalizaiton has brought many new brands and products into the local market. Thus, local residents could get in touch with advanced digital products, such as latest smart phones and smart sweeping robots, which would broaden their horizon and free them from repetitive housework. In addition, they can read enlightening foreign books full of creative and different thoughts, and communicate with foreign celebrities on social issues, philosophy and science in the books. The contact with new things would undoubtedly improve their living standard and somehow prompt the innovation of the whole society.
Another benefit would be the promotion of global economy. On the one hand, the imported products are made in other countries, most of which are developing ones like China. This would be benificial for the boosting of their economy and the establishment of basic industries. On the other hand, this way of production would remarkably cut the cost, so customers all around the world can spend less money on daily products.
However, the downside of importing goods may be the pollution. The worldwide transportation of products would produce a large amount of greenhouse gases, which may cause serious damages to the environment. Besides, it’s difficult for the government to balance development and environmental protection, so factories in most developing countries would probably pay more attention to efficient production rather than dealing waste water and gas. That’s the reason of water and soil erosion and many other environmental issues in these countries.
In conclusion, importing products does have positive impacts on the living standard of people and global economy, but how to balance development and environmental disruption remains a tricky problem for local government.
- The efficient functioning of society is based on rules and laws Society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- many people are moving from rural areas to big cities Why has this happened To what extent do you think it is a good trend 78
- The efficient functioning of society is based on rules and laws Society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that children should obey rules and do what their parents and teachers want them to do Other people think that children controlled too much cannot deal with problems themselves in adulthood Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'limited access'.
Suggestion: limited access
...ly buy local food and clothes, and have a limited access to new things. But globalizaiton has br...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54098360656 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93811269288 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587431693989 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8478974924 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181766643943 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503496352793 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443743557535 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102272458257 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437248339675 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.