In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
It is not uncommon to see a growing number of residents conducting research on the history of their current accommodations. This accelerating trend can be ascribed to two possible rationales which are a sense of attachment and assurance that can be gained through research. To gain an in-depth knowledge of their buildings, people could utilize the power of the Internet or inquire their neighbors and previous residents.
Researching the past of the buildings allows residents to acquire a sense of belonging and safety about their houses. Admittedly, by collecting information about past events and alterations, residents could gain a thorough understanding of how their houses underwent changes that have shaped them like today. This can result in a more concrete connection which would encourage people to value and appreciate their homes. A second key driving force behind this trend is the possible sense of assurance. As a way to examine the condition of their houses throughout different phases, residents can detect and resolve possible facility problems that would affect their lives.
There are two possible ways for residents to acquire information about their houses. The first and foremost resource is through the Internet. As a part of marketing, previous owners will publish basic information about their houses like their current condition, their ages, and shortcomings on websites to attract potential buyers. This can also be gained on Facebook and other social media platforms, particularly on numerous house groups. Secondly, inquiring neighbors can also be an effective way to do research on accommodations. Since surrounding residents may reside there longer, they obtain a more accurate and in-depth knowledge of their neighborhoods and surrounding areas.
By way of conclusion, researching the history of houses is proved to be meritable for residents as they could grow a stronger sense of belonging to their places. Moreover, reassurance can be obtained as they can avoid problems regarding infrastructure. This can be carried out with the appearance of neighbors and the Internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- Even though globalization affects the world s economies in a very positive way its negative side should not be forgotten Present argumentation to highlight your opinion on this matter Give reasons and specific examples to support your opinion s Express yo 89
- With the rise of the internet more and more people are getting their news from social media platforms Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons and 84
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of belonging to their places. Moreover, reassurance can be obtained as they can ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50920245399 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0239238288 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515337423313 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8400782367 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.647058824 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223991416295 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802848476251 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470811576801 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155526590105 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028364444177 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.