In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
It is widely acknowledged that the building or house history generally draws the attention of people. This trend is driven by several factors, and some viable solutions can be implemented to help them obtain more information relating to this.
There are two compelling reasons as to the proliferation of the house or building history exploration. First and foremost, being aware of fascinating building history stories from media can instill individuals to investigate more about that. For example, various simulating narratives of the building history have been portrayed through various TV programs or films. In addition to this, people under an obligation of purchasing or renting new houses or apartments, call a demand for researching carefully about the history.
In order to address the aforementioned issue, people should administer the following measures. Firstly, investing time on the internet or social media is key to familiarizing people with information from google or online persons. Inasmuch as the internet is a global network with a host of persons from field and culture differences, people can gain any knowledge they have a soft spot. Another feasible solution could be to ask directly to local residents about the houses or buildings people appeal to explore the history. The help from such persons is irrefutably beneficial and necessary for people to have a comprehensive understanding of the history of these houses or even hidden secrets of them.
In conclusion, the general understanding of the history of the buildings or houses that we live in may stem from numerous underlying factors, and the proposed solutions can be executed to reverse the trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-12 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, still, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0025834373 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2475554599 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364942562868 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122351911439 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489987599764 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20929576735 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704047228162 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.