In some countries, more people are becoming interseted in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can peope research this question?
Nowadays, choosing a new place to live is extremely important that many people intend to discover the history of the house or building where they are going to buy. There are several reasons that lead to this decision and methods to carry out these ideas will be required.
Before arriving to new accommodation, carefully finding out the history may be a right action with some justifiable explantions. To begin with, some old buildings have an interesting history about the construction and the architecture. For example, ancient houses which are built more than 50 years ago have special type of para- mordern architecture, mixing with the traditional construction. Studying about these houses can bring beneficial knowledge as well as exciting experiences. Besides, some people who believe in fortune, they would have a scrunity in the appearance and the location, whether it brings luck and wealth or not. According to Asian philosophy, a house which back to the mountains with a river flows frontal is an ideal place to live and progress in career.
There are many methods to figure out the history of a building. One of the effective ways is to contact with the company who provide the selling information, and they can connect us with previous owners. In addition, people can ask the surrounding residents, who live there and witness the formation as well as changes for years. Internet is also a plenty source that can supply useful information needed.
In conclusion, searching for the history of a place before making a decision is more popular these days, because of curiosity and its benefits. To help with the problem, several method is neccessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- It is inevitale that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun method seems to be countable; consider using: 'several methods'.
Suggestion: several methods
...its benefits. To help with the problem, several method is neccessary.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07299270073 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80333786419 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9951977401 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28461456829 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855508448011 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417858267194 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156029914826 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592127678245 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.