In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In contemporary life, many a young adult in some countries opts to continually live under the roof with their parents, although they graduate and find suitable jobs. From my perspective, this trend contains several advantages that can affect their life and their society in the future.
Should they choose to live with their parents, this tendency may have a detrimental impact on their life. Since they may not have well- prepared experiences to confront all difficulties that they will face in the future. For example, a young adult has lived with their parents since he or she was young. This means that they are well protected by their parents and they do not pay any attention to financial burdens. Finally, they could not accumulate any intangible assets for their own family in the future or they do not have any assets used to tackle any incidents when they get. Therefore, only when they still live with their parents will they be immature in their mindset.
Besides, this trend may create several problems for their own community. If other youngsters may imitate their lifestyle, the housing market will be affected in the future. To be specific, once plenty of young people choose not to buy any houses leading to the corruption of the real estate market. In addition, in their own community, it turns up a vast majority of immature adults who can not organize and solve their problems by themselves. As a result, their society converts into a chaotic world. Above all, this trend may have directly deleterious impacts on their society that can become a big mess.
In a nutshell, the trend of living with parents of young adults has disadvantages for not only their life but also their society in the future that they can predict and have an ability to avoid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period Write a description of the two graphs and make comparisons with at least 150 words 67
- Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The youth in many countries are unemployed and unskilled while at the same time the military services are in need of people Compulsory military service is beneficial and necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local businesses are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local businesses will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ave a detrimental impact on their life. Since they may not have well- prepared experi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dens. Finally, they could not accumulate any intangible assets for their own fami...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86184210526 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46267145444 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519736842105 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0877941815 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331696772725 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129077004744 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874032400468 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230132913258 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799028200371 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.