In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people.
Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
People in some nations consider having their own house is better than renting one. The most common reason for that is life stability, comfort and security. In my opinion, whether this is positive or negative depends on a number of factors.
First of all, owning a house means people do not need to worry about the monthly rent payment. The only purchase that has to be spent when considering buying a house is the amount of money to buy that, combined with the furniture and other household appliances. After that, everything is in hand: from dividing the areas for different purposes to designing and decorating, which people having the idea to rent a house never have a chance to do. Moreover, in developed countries such as China and the USA, renting a house is counted as the poor, in other words, having financial problems. Parents usually take this as one of the reasons not to let their children find a no-owning-house or renting partner.
Moving ahead, it is considerably both a positive or negative case, depending on a person’s financial circumstances. For those who have enough money earned from working to purchase a big house with few facilities, their house is a pricey possession and it is an advantage. However, for mostly middle class families or university students, buying a house is quite out of their budget, spending a huge amount of their earnings and owning a living building ends up being in debt, which negatively affects their lives. In addition to this, they have to pay property taxes and insurance which are directly proportional to the area of a home, also the electricity and water bills.
To conclude, I believe that owning a house is a better choice and a pleasurable experience. Nevertheless, this could turn into a nightmare of their lives if they cannot afford and get a loan, which is quite beyond their repayment capability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-24 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-24 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-24 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-20 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-20 | Daniel3003 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gative depends on a number of factors. First of all, owning a house means p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a no-owning-house or renting partner. Moving ahead, it is considerably bot...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso the electricity and water bills. To conclude, I believe that owning a hou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, as for, as to, in addition, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90251572327 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75785446382 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7406731878 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.357142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230643129658 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849069024697 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545312207999 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151291286058 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071895765404 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.