In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development

Work is crucial to live the luxurious life. In few nations residents devote long hours at job. There are multifarious reasons behind this trend as people aspire to get bonus and they can get promotion. However, I assume it is a negative development as they remain under stress.

To commence with reasons, employees want to develop better bonds with their boss. As workers give priority to their work, they can ameliorate their relationship with manager. To exemplify, it is commonly seen that individuals who do overtime they get extra support from the head of the company. In addition to this, overtime escalate the chances of promotion. Because factions work hard to compete with their staff, they can improve their position in the firm. Resultantly, they can achieve higher post in the corporation.

Moving further, workers can get bonus. Boss provides extra pay to the employees who work for longer durations so the staff members get allured to spend more time at work. To illustrate, in India, the most renowned organisations give bonus as an appreciation of the work of employees like Tata company. Eventually, workers can easily fulfil their basic needs. If staff members can get bonus then why folks should not spend longer hours at work?

Now discussing negative development, people stay under stress. When dwellers do more work, they get less time for relaxation. As a result, it can reduce their their productivity in work. What is more, it can originate conflicts in the family. Inhabitants spend less time with their loved ones while doing work which draws a line between their relations with the family. To cite an example, businesses are having numerous family problems just because of their hectic schedules.

To conclude, working overtime provides various benefits to employees. Although factions stay under stress due to their longer working hours, yet workers receive bonus for their extra work.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: their
... relaxation. As a result, it can reduce their their productivity in work. What is more, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, as a result, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17628205128 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59197788551 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.77183563 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.2173913043 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5652173913 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21739130435 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186405877116 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578193860557 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531604693196 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116418448335 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545252553416 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.