Secondary School curriculum can be organised in a variety of ways. Many countries people adopt only short distance of subjects and they have a good qualification on specific subject. However, a number of countries are opposite from above statement and they give a whole knowledge full a range of subjects. I believe each things are own merit and demerit, so I doing explain both side in the following paragraph.
Elementary, each coin has two sides in the same way I talking about one side. To comments with, according to me people do study on 7 subjects in the secondary school and if they can be better study that time, therefore they can be obtained a good fam ins and out from related their subject which can be utility in the journey of life. Beside this, if teenager do comprehensive learning, so they would have good skills of all departments and they can be dedicate your information in different sectors. For instance, with students having the ambition to work as translators or applied language researchers in the future, it is a course of basic grammar and vocabulary at their Secondary Schools that can realise the dream.
On the other side of coin, when student have one certificate of a specific subject so they would be only one job familiar with subject in the company. For strong example, in a University student do take one subject and do not accept other subject after they do study on particular subject on until PhD graduation. Many times they do not gain better salary on short range of subjects and they doing prefer rotated job.
In final words, my opinion are on par with the idea that Secondary School children should be supplied with knowledge in as many fields as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...ch things are own merit and demerit, so I doing explain both side in the followin...
^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...each coin has two sides in the same way I talking about one side. To comments wit...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, talking about, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76013513514 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63357325508 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1812284134 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175218788715 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699092707107 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445105658772 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111885035302 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377189894812 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.